Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

To people with the necessary technology the internet can provide vast amounts of health information. However, there are concerns about the quality of the information and how it may affect relationships between patients and doctors. Little empirical research has examined how the internet is used by those diagnosed with a serious illness. This study uses in-depth interviews collected for DIPEx projects with men and women with cancer. The analysis is informed by Radley and Billig's (Sociol. Health Illness 2 (1996) 220) observation that accounts of illness require patients to simultaneously display themselves as 'worthy individuals, as more or less fit participants in the social world' and on Arthur Frank's work on quest narratives. Drawing on in-depth interviews with a woman with inflammatory breast cancer and a man with prostate cancer I will demonstrate how the internet has been used not only to gather information and gain support from others but also to make sense of the experience of cancer. The ability to access health information on the internet may provide patients with an opportunity to display a particularly modern marker of competence and social fitness. However, one of the consequences of easier access to health information may be the emergence of a felt imperative to be (or present oneself as) an expert and critical patient, able to question advice and locate effective treatments for oneself. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.019

Type

Journal article

Journal

Social Science and Medicine

Publication Date

01/01/2004

Volume

59

Pages

1783 - 1793