Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' experiences of getting a diagnosis of eye disease, the psychological impact of this and how this could be improved. DESIGN: An exploratory qualitative interview study using a narrative approach and inductive methods. SETTING: This study was conducted with patients who had attended ophthalmic appointments in primary and secondary care and in opticians located in the South of England. PARTICIPANTS: 18 people diagnosed with eye disease in England. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: the convoluted process of being diagnosed, the impact of clinicians' words, the search for information and reflections on what could be improved. The prolonged wait for a definitive diagnosis was a source of frustration and anxiety for many patients. Professionals' words and tone when delivering a diagnosis sometimes affected a patient's view of their diagnosis and their later ability to come to terms with it. Patients were desperate for information, but many felt they were not provided with sufficient information at the time of diagnosis and did not know whether to trust information found online. Participants felt the provision of a hospital liaison service and/or counselling could mitigate the impact on patients and families. CONCLUSIONS: Interactions with clinicians can have a lasting impact on how a diagnosis is experienced and how well the patient is able to come to terms with their visual impairment. Receiving little or no information left patients feeling lost and unsupported. This led them to search for information from less reliable sources. Clinicians should consider how they communicate a diagnosis to patients, how and when they offer information about diagnosis and prognosis and where possible signpost patients to additional support systems and counselling services as early as possible.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059970

Type

Journal article

Journal

BMJ Open

Publication Date

21/07/2022

Volume

12

Keywords

mental health, ophthalmology, qualitative research, England, Eye Diseases, Humans, Qualitative Research, Secondary Care