Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.
Skip to main content

The idea of a comprehensive coding system, able to code any concept has allure; similarly linking a term to related concepts. However, there appear to be flaws: firstly just getting these links right and keeping them up-to-date, secondly how you find data in such a comprehensive system? If limited lists have to be imposed to make things usable why not just stick with the limited list? Routine data offers enormous opportunities for quality improvement and research;12 we should avoid putting this at risk until these issues are resolved. Perhaps a head-to-head test of SNOMED CT v. the widely used combination of the International Classification of Disease (ICD)13 and the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)14,15 is needed to resolve these important issues. Further debate is needed about the pros and cons of SNOMED CT. Are these teething problems or fundamental flaws? © 2011 PHCSG, British Computer Society.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Informatics in Primary Care

Publication Date

01/11/2011

Volume

19

Pages

3 - 5