Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

© British Journal of General Practice Background Safety netting is recommended in a variety of clinical settings, yet there are no tools to record clinician safety-netting communication behaviours. Aim To develop and assess the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of a coding tool designed to assess safety-netting communication behaviours in primary care consultations. Design and setting A mixed-methods study using an existing dataset of video- and audio-recorded UK primary care consultations. Method Key components that should be assessed in a coding tool were identified using the published literature and relevant guidelines. An iterative approach was utilised to continuously refine and generate new codes based on the application to real-life consultations. After the codebook had been generated, it was applied to 35 problems in 24 consultations independently by two coders. IRR scores were then calculated. Results The tool allows for the identification and quantification of the key elements of safety-netting advice including: who initiates the advice and at which stage of the consultation; the number of symptoms or conditions the patient is advised to look out for; what action patients should take and how urgently; as well as capturing how patients respond to such advice plus important contextual codes such as the communication of diagnostic uncertainty, the expected time course of an illness, and any follow-up plans. The final tool had substantial levels of IRR with the mean average agreement for the final tool being 88% (κ = 0.66). Conclusion The authors have developed a novel tool that can reliably code the extent of clinician safety-netting communication behaviours.

Original publication

DOI

10.3399/bjgp19X706589

Type

Journal article

Journal

British Journal of General Practice

Publication Date

01/01/2019

Volume

69

Pages

E869 - E877