Factors affecting the documentation of spoken safety-netting advice in routine GP consultations: A cross-sectional study

Background Previous studies have reported how often safetynetting is documented in medical records, but it is not known how this compares with what is verbalised and what factors might influence the consistency of documentation. Aim To compare spoken and documented safetynetting advice and to explore factors associated with documentation. Design and setting A cross-sectional study, using an existing GP consultations archive. Method Observational coding involving classifying and quantifying medical record entries and comparison with spoken safety-netting advice in 295 video-/audio-recorded consultations. Associations were tested using logistic regression. Results Two-Thirds of consultations (192/295) contained spoken safety-netting advice that applied to less than half of the problems assessed (242/516). Only one-Third of consultations (94/295) had documented safety-netting advice, which covered 20.3% of problems (105/516). The practice of GPs varied widely, from those that did not document their safety-netting advice to those that nearly always did so (86.7%). GPs were more likely to document their safety-netting advice for new problems (P = 0.030), when only a single problem was discussed in a consultation (P = 0.040), and when they gave specific rather than generic safety-netting advice (P = 0.007). In consultations where multiple problems were assessed (n = 139), the frequency of spoken and documented safetynetting advice decreased the later a problem was assessed. Conclusion GPs frequently do not document the safetynetting advice they have given to patients, which may have medicolegal implications in the event of an untoward incident. GPs should consider how safely they can assess and document more than one problem in a single consultation and this risk should be shared with patients to help manage expectations.