Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Background A high level of photoprotection is required by people with xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), a rare skin disease, to reduce skin cancer and other risks. However poor photoprotection is thought to be widespread. Purpose This study examines the influences on photoprotection behaviours in adults with XP. Design Inductive qualitative study with semistructured interviews. Analysis employed a framework approach. Setting National sample recruited through a specialist XP centre in London. Methods Semistructured interviews at patients' homes. All transcripts were coded and themes charted for each participant. Comparisons within and across cases identified common themes and differing motivations and approaches to photoprotection. Credibility of interpretations assessed through patient/carer input and clinic adherence scores. Participants 25 adults (17 male, eight female) aged 16-63 years with diagnosed XP attending a specialist centre. 18 lived outside London. Results Awareness of risks of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and photoprotection was high. However, photoprotection behaviours varied according to perceived necessity and concerns. Three behavioural responses were identified: (1) 'dominated' by planning and routines to achieve a high level of photoprotection with significant activity restrictions and psychosocial impacts. (2) 'resistant' to photoprotection with priority given to avoiding an illness identity and enjoying a normal life. (3) Photoprotection' integrated' with an individual's life with little psychosocial impact. These responses were influenced by illness, personal and contextual factors including age, life stage and social support. Only the 'integrated' group achieved an equilibrium between perceived 'necessity' and 'concerns'. Conclusions The personal balance between perceived risks of UVR and social/psychological 'concerns' led to differing behavioural responses and contributes to an understanding of adaptation and normalisation in chronic illness. The study will also inform a series of individualised behavioural interventions to reduce measured UVR exposure among people with XP that are potentially applicable to other conditions with high risks of skin cancer.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024445

Type

Journal article

Journal

BMJ Open

Publication Date

01/02/2019

Volume

9