Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Introduction: We evaluated the accuracy of a disposable, sterile thermometer that is practical in use and holds no risk of cross-infections. Methods: a cross-sectional study was set up in which we compared the Tempa Dot® with the mercury thermometer in adults and children. Subjects were recruited from general practice and a paediatric ward. The mercury thermometer was used orally in subjects over 2 years of age and rectally in children up to 2 years old. The Tempa Dot® was used either orally or axillary. Results: The total population consisted of 212 patients, of which 131 children were younger than 16 years old. Their mean age was 17.3 years old, ranging from 1 month to 76 years. The mean difference between the mercury thermometer and the Tempa Dot®, used orally or axillary, was 0.04°C. For children between 0 and 16 years old, the mean difference was 0.08°C. Agreement between the two methods as assessed with regression analysis and Bland and Altman plots was very good. ROC curve analysis suggests cut-off points of 37.2 and 37.6°C to detect fever for the Tempa Dot® at the oral and the axillary site respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 79.0% for the total population, measuring orally and 100.0% and 95.9% axillary. In children, sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 83.1% orally, and 100.0% and 95.4% axillary. Using a single cut-off point for both measuring sites, namely 37.5°C, sensitivity dropped and specificity increased for the oral site. For the axillary site, sensitivity remained unchanged and specificity was somewhat less. Conclusion: the Tempa Dot® is a reliable alternative for the mercury thermometer. In clinical use, a cut-off point of 37.5°C for both the oral and axillary site is most appropriate. © 2005 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Technology and Health Care

Publication Date

06/07/2005

Volume

13

Pages

97 - 106