Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a group general practice's implementation of a decision to prescribe 3 day courses of 200 mg trimethoprim twice daily for urinary tract infections in women and to compare 3 day courses with 5 and 7 day courses. DESIGN: Record review, audit of trimethoprim prescribing for urinary tract infections, and critical appraisal of evidence originally presented in support of 3 day course. SETTING: Group general practice in Newcastle upon Tyne. DATA SOURCES: The records of all female patients aged 12 years and older who were prescribed trimethoprim for uncomplicated urinary tract infections during a 12 month period were reviewed. 271 valid records were identified. DATA EXTRACTION: Prescribing rates for different courses of trimethoprim, rates of patients returning for second consultations, rates of urine cultures, results of cultures, results of critical appraisal of evidence. RESULTS: 114 of 271 (42%) prescriptions written at the first visit were for 3 day courses. 16 of 114 (14%) patients who had had a 3 day course of treatment returned for a second consultation compared with 6/83 (7.2%) of those who had had a 5 day course and 8/74 (11%) who had had a 7 day course. The difference between 3 day and 5 day courses in rates of returning for second consultations was 6.8% (95% CI -1.7% to 12.6%) and between 3 day and 7 day courses was 3.2% (-3.6% to 10.0%). Appraisal of the original evidence on which the practice based its recommendations showed that it was flawed. Additional evidence was found in the Cochrane Library. CONCLUSIONS: Our original decision, made by consensus at a meeting of the practice's partners, had not led to a consistent change in practice. We did not find a significant increase in treatment failures among patients treated with the 3 day regimen.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1114

Type

Journal article

Journal

BMJ

Publication Date

22/04/2000

Volume

320

Pages

1114 - 1118

Keywords

Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary, Child, Clinical Competence, Decision Making, Education, Medical, Continuing, Evidence-Based Medicine, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Medical Audit, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Recurrence, Trimethoprim