Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Net radiation is a key component of the energy balance, whose estimation accuracy has an impact on energy flux estimates from satellite data. In typical remote sensing evapotranspiration (ET) algorithms, the outgoing shortwave and longwave components of net radiation are obtained from remote sensing data, while the incoming shortwave (R < inf > S < /inf > ↓ ) and longwave (R < inf > L < /inf > ↓ ) components are typically estimated from weather data using empirical equations. This study evaluates the accuracy of empirical equations commonly used in remote sensing ET algorithms for estimating R < inf > S < /inf > ↓ and R < inf > L < /inf > ↓ radiation. Evaluation is carried out through comparison of estimates and observations at five sites that represent different climatic regions from humid to arid. Results reveal (1) both R < inf > S < /inf > ↓ and R < inf > L < /inf > ↓ estimates from all evaluated equations well correlate with observations (R2 ≥ 0.92), (2) R < inf > S < /inf > ↓ estimating equations tend to overestimate, especially at higher values, (3) R < inf > L < /inf > ↓ estimating equations tend to give more biased values in arid and semi-arid regions, (4) a model that parameterizes the diffuse component of radiation using two clearness indices and a simple model that assumes a linear increase of atmospheric transmissivity with elevation give better R < inf > S < /inf > ↓ estimates, and (5) mean relative absolute errors in the net radiation (Rn) estimates caused by the use of R < inf > S < /inf > ↓ and R < inf > L < /inf > ↓ estimating equations varies from 10% to 22%. This study suggests that R n estimates using recommended incoming radiation estimating equations could improve ET estimates. © 2013 by the authors.

Original publication

DOI

10.3390/rs5104735

Type

Journal article

Journal

Remote Sensing

Publication Date

09/10/2013

Volume

5

Pages

4735 - 4752