Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

© 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Objective: To develop and validate the Evaluation of AGenda-mapping skilL Instrument (EAGL-I). Methods: EAGL-I was constructed after a literature review and piloting. Simulated consultation recordings were collected in a workshop with third-year medical students at three time points: once pre-teaching, twice post-teaching. Three raters used EAGL-I to assess student agenda-mapping. We examined reliability, ability to detect change and predict full expression of patients' agendas. Results: EAGL-I scores represented reliable assessment of agenda-mapping (Ep<sup>2</sup>=0.832; ϕ=0.675). Generalizability coefficients across items (Ep<sup>2</sup>=0.836) and raters (ϕ=0.797 two raters) were acceptable. A one-way repeated measure ANOVA with post hoc analysis found a statistically significant difference between the pre-teaching occasion of measurement and each post-teaching occasion (p<0.001) and no significant difference between the two post-teaching occasions (p=0.085). Multilevel logistic regression show scores predict expression of scripted hidden agendas irrespective of occasions, or patient scenario (n=60, p=0.005). Conclusion: Evidence of measure validation is shown. Reliability is optimised when two or more raters use EAGL-I and agenda-mapping has been taught. EAGL-I appears sensitive to change. Higher scores predict the likelihood that a patient will disclose their full agenda in a simulated environment. Practice implications: A validated tool for measuring agenda-mapping in teaching and research is now available.

Original publication




Journal article


Patient Education and Counseling

Publication Date





1214 - 1221