Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Strategies for prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) in primary care need to take into account the number of people who require screening, further assessment, intervention and follow-up (i.e. the patient workload generated for the general practitioner) as well as the anticipated reductions in morbidity and mortality. Risks of CHD for various risk profiles were estimated from equations produced by the Framingham study. This enabled an estimate of the number of avertable CHD events to be compared against the patient workload implications for the general practitioner when different screening and intervention strategies were used. The Framingham equations were applied to a population of 5727 men and women aged 35-64 years of age registered with general practices in the south of England. Adopting an unselective approach to screening resulted in 14.1 % (n = 73) of the 517 CHD events predicted over a 10 year period being averted. A limited screening strategy, involving 25% (n = 1436) of the patients would avert 5.6% (n = 29) of the predicted CHD events, whilst more extended strategies involving between 37% (n = 2131) and 46% (n = 2660) of the practice population respectively would result in between 6.9% (n = 36) and 9.3% (n = 48) of events being averted. The marginal benefit in averting CHD events decreased as more screening criteria were included. Almost all (99%) of the people identified by the selective screening strategies would require some form of intervention, predominantly lifestyle advice. Lowering the systolic blood pressure by 15 mmHg instead of 10 mmHg was equally effective as a 5% improvement in the overall rate of smoking cessation. The greatest increase in the proportion of CHD events averted resulted from even smaller improvements in the effectiveness of lipid-lowering interventions. We conclude that this approach is useful in evaluating the potential effects of different preventive strategies for CHD in primary care and, with further refinement, may provide a useful basis for guiding clinical practice and planning health care policy. © 1994.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/0895-4356(94)90114-7

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Publication Date

01/01/1994

Volume

47

Pages

993 - 1001