Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: Home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring has become a primary method for hypertension diagnosis and management. Most hypertension guidelines suggest HBP monitoring for 3-7 days and exclusion of first day for calculation of the average. This analysis investigated the optimal and minimum schedule for HBP monitoring using a European database. DESIGN AND METHOD: A retrospective analysis of cross-sectional research data was performed, which involved HBP and 24-hour ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring in adults collected within the context of clinical studies in Finland, Greece, and UK. Participants with 6-7 HBP monitoring days and at least 12 HBP readings were included. The stability of HBP was assessed by evaluating the average value and variability (SD) of an increasing number of readings. The association of different HBP schedules with awake ABP was also assessed. RESULTS: Data from 2,122 participants were analyzed (mean age 53.9 ± 11.3 years, males 53%, treated 34%). A progressive HBP decline was observed in succeeding days, reaching a plateau after day 3. Day 1 average HBP was higher than in the next days by about 2.8/1.4 mmHg (systolic/diastolic, p < 0.001). Similarly, day 1 HBP SD was higher than in the next days. In a 3-day HBP monitoring schedule, the exclusion of day 1 reduced average HBP and SD, with a clinically important HBP decline in 115 participants (5%) and different hypertension diagnosis in 120 (6%). For HBP monitoring schedules including more than 3 days, the exclusion of day 1 had negligible impact. In a 6-day HBP monitoring schedule, the exclusion of day 1 led to clinically important HBP decline in 0.4% of participants and to different hypertension diagnosis in 3%. The 3-day average HBP was strongly correlated with awake ABP (correlation coefficient r = 0.70/0.77 systolic/diastolic, p < 0.05), with little improvement thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the recommendation for 7-day HBP monitoring as optimal schedule and 3-day as minimum. Readings of the first day should better be excluded, particularly when the minimum 3-day monitoring is obtained.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1097/01.hjh.0000835348.77895.11

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2022-06-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

40