Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Objectives This commentary aims to highlight the opportunities and challenges that Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents for public health. Study design Narrative commentary and conceptual analysis. Methods The commentary draws on material developed for a forthcoming book by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Sources were selected to highlight both the potential and the limitations of AI integration at population levels, with a focus on equity, governance, and implementation. The analysis is informed by established public health principles: prevention, systems thinking, and the social determinants of health. Results AI applications in public health go beyond process automation and operational efficiency. By integrating and processing diverse, multi-modal data sources, its implementation presents opportunities to understand the wider determinants of health at a more nuanced level and identify populations at risk with greater precision. Additionally, AI has the potential to help understand and support behaviour change in sophisticated ways, enhance disease surveillance and modelling, and enable more targeted and responsive public communication and engagement strategies. However, there are several barriers to realise AI's potential in public health, including system fragmentation, data access limitations, resource constraints, implementation challenges, workforce readiness gaps, and technological limitations such as bias and generative AI “hallucinations”. Conclusion Without deliberate engagement, AI risks reinforcing existing inequities. Practical steps for action include embedding AI training in public health education, building multidisciplinary teams, investing in data infrastructure, and ensuring participatory approaches. AI will continue to shape public health systems, whether or not public health professionals engage. We argue that the public health community is both uniquely positioned and ethically obligated to engage proactively with AI.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.puhe.2025.106047

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

250