Search results
Found 19860 matches for
We lead multidisciplinary applied research and training to rethink the way health care is delivered in general practice and across the community.
A pilot protocol for surveillance of infection and antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare across the globe: Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Healthcare Point Prevalence Survey (APC-PPS)
Little data is available from the primary healthcare setting in low- and middle-income countries to describe the burden of clinical infections and antibiotic prescribing proportions for those infections. The AWaRe Antibiotic Book provides a framework for assessing antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare but requires understanding both frequency of clinical infections and their antibiotic prescribing proportions. The Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Healthcare Point Prevalence Survey (APC-PPS) project is a series of point prevalence surveys conducted at primary healthcare facilities in LMICs to capture the frequency of consultation for different clinical infections and diagnoses and the frequency and type of antibiotic prescribing associated with these infections in primary healthcare facilities. This study aims to assess the feasibility of using a PPS methodology to collect data on clinical presentation and antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare settings. The data collected are necessary to be able to summarise relative rates of presentation of different clinical infections and antibiotic prescribing practices to inform global estimates of antibiotic use and inform the development of surveillance methods and representative sampling frames. Each site will conduct 6-8 point prevalence surveys over the course of 12 months. Completely anonymous data on age, sex, relevant comorbidities, infection symptoms and diagnoses and antibiotic prescription are collected for patients of all ages with acute infection symptoms (up to 14 days of symptoms) who present to the facility on the day of the survey. No identifiable data will be collected from individuals. Data is collected via ODK Collect and stored in a secure ODK Cloud server hosted by City St. George’s, University of London. Sites will be active between early 2023- end 2024, with regular interim data analysis scheduled and final data analysis planned by mid 2025. All required local and national ethical and regulatory approvals will be obtained prior to sites starting.
Umbrella review of economic evaluations of interventions for the prevention and management of healthcare-associated infections in adult hospital patients.
INTRODUCTION: Healthcare-associated infections result in worse outcomes for patients and greater financial burden. An estimated 4.8 million HCAIs occurred in hospitals across Europe in 2022-23. Sixty-four percent of antibiotic-resistant infections in Europe are associated with healthcare. It is therefore vital to identify cost-effective interventions. Our objective was to summarise the cost-effectiveness evidence of interventions addressing HCAIs in hospitals. METHODS: An umbrella review was conducted to identify evidence on the cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship, infection prevention and control, and microbiology and diagnostic stewardship interventions for the prevention and clinical management of HCAIs in adult hospital patients. Medline, Embase and EconLit databases were searched. A qualitative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: Twenty-four systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria, with 101 separate analyses extracted and grouped into 10 intervention and 14 infection/organism categories, across various countries and settings. Most evidence focussed on screening followed by contact precautions, isolation and/or decolonisation, with selective screening most cost-effective. Most IPC bundles were cost-effective, although interventions were heterogeneous. The evidence base was sparse for the remaining intervention categories, with more research required. The limited evidence suggests standalone environmental cleaning, hand hygiene, diagnostics, surveillance, ABS, and decolonisation interventions were mostly cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness of standalone personal protective equipment, and education and training interventions was mixed. Most interventions focussed on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive infections, with more research needed on Gram-negative infections. The comparator was unclear in many extracted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effective interventions to address HCAIs in hospitals exist, although more evidence is needed for most interventions.
Local excision for T1 rectal cancer: A population-based study of practice patterns and oncological outcomes
Aim: Local excision (LE) for T1 rectal cancer may be recommended in those with low-risk disease, while resection is typically recommended in those with a high risk of luminal recurrence or lymph node metastasis. The aim of this work was to compare survival between resection and LE. Method: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study set in the Canadian province of Ontario. Patients were individuals with T1Nx rectal cancer between 2010 and 2014 and demographics, disease characteristics, treatments and outcomes were determined using linked administrative databases. This study does not include clinical information regarding individual patient treatment decisions. The main outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 719 patients were identified, including 359 with upfront resection, 113 with LE and immediate resection (<90 days) and 247 with LE with definitive intent. The majority of LEs were performed via colonoscopy. Piecemeal excision (42% vs. 49%, p = 0.28) and positive margin (50% vs. 77%, p < 0.01) rates were high in both LE groups, with the highest rate in those with immediate resection. The prevalence of poor differentiation (<5%, p = 0.70) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (14%, p = 0.80) was similar across groups. In those with LE with definitive intent, 21% ultimately underwent resection (median 150 days, interquartile range 114–181 days) and 4% received radiation. There was no difference in 5-year OS between groups (resection 83.2% vs. LE and immediate resection 82.3% vs. definitive LE 83.3%; p = 0.33). Adjusted analyses demonstrated no association between approach and survival [definitive intent LE hazard ratio (HR) 0.97 (95% CI 0.70–1.35), LE and immediate resection HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.60–1.45), upfront resection HR 1 (Ref); p = 0.98]. Differentiation, piecemeal excisions and LVI were not associated with OS in the LE groups. Conclusion: There were no observed differences in survival between those who underwent resection, LE and immediate resection and definitive intent LE. Although, these are observational data, they call into question the reflexive decision to offer radical resection for those with suspected T1 rectal cancer.
Patient and public involvement mobile workshops - convenient involvement for the un-usual suspects.
PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: When planning a research project into patients' experiences of online booking of GP appointments, we tried out a new way to get feedback from the public on our research ideas and design. As the research topic is about GP services used by the general public, we wanted to get feedback from people with a broad range of backgrounds and perspectives. However, relying on individuals to firstly want to volunteer and then to take time to travel to and attend such an event, means that involvement may only be attractive to certain people. Others less interested in being involved - or those with busy schedules and additional responsibilities - may be unlikely or unable to attend.With this in mind, we ran a series of mobile workshops designed to be particularly convenient to attend. Each workshop was arranged at a time and a place where potential volunteers were already present and available. For example, at a workplace or a social group during a scheduled break or popular time. This meant each workshop was convenient to attend as they were at a suitable time with no travel. They also were short, lasting 30 min, to minimise disruption to individuals' diaries. To make taking part appealing, attendees were also paid (which is standard practice for patient and public involvement). This paper summarises and evaluates the process of running these workshops. ABSTRACT: Background Patient and public involvement in research is a quickly-evolving area, with investigators developing new approaches in recent years. One concern about patient and public involvement is that it only appeals to certain individuals. When designing research into online GP services - a topic relevant to the general population - we recognised the importance of involving members of the public with a broad range of backgrounds who may not have the time, resources and inclination to volunteer normally. Methods We devised a strategy that aimed to involve members of the public from varied backgrounds, who would not typically be able to be involved. We ran a series of one-off mobile workshops at existing organisations where potential volunteers were already in situ. The workshops were kept short, making them convenient and easily accessible. Volunteers were also paid, to ensure taking part was appealing. Results We ran a series of 4 workshops involving 26 members of the public with office workers, supermarket staff, gym members (and their friends) and parents attending a toddler group. Overall the workshops were successful, as they enabled us to gain varied perspectives from volunteers with a broad range of backgrounds, many of whom had not previously been involved in research. A key challenge was making initial contact with members of approached organisations. This indicates that it may be beneficial to consider how to make the workshops appealing, not just on an individual level, but at an organisational level too. A carefully planned design worked as it enabled large amounts of input in a limited amount of time, apart from one workshop (the parent group) due to practical reasons. This highlighted some limitations of this approach that could be addressed by adapting the workshop design, according to the organisation with which they are being run. Conclusion Running one-off mobile workshops at already existing organisations allowed us to involve members of the public from a broad range of backgrounds, who would not typically volunteer to be involved in research. This was particularly suitable as the topic we were designing research for - booking GP appointments - is relevant to the general public.
The association of loneliness and social isolation with multimorbidity over 14 years in older adults in England: A population-based cohort study
Background: Previous longitudinal studies have linked multimorbidity to loneliness (feeling alienated) and social isolation (having reduced social contact). However, the nature of these associations over time is unclear. Objective: To examine bidirectional associations of multimorbidity with loneliness and social isolation over a 14-year follow-up in a nationally representative cohort of adults aged ≥ 50 years. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used seven waves of data (collected between 2004/2005 and 2018/2019) from adults in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of ≥2 long-term conditions. Loneliness was measured using the 3-item University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale. Social isolation was derived based on cohabitation status, frequency of contact with children, relatives, and friends, and social organisation membership. We used Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for social isolation or loneliness, demographic and health behaviour variables. Results: The cohort consisted of 6031 adults with baseline and follow-up data on loneliness, social isolation, multimorbidity, and other covariates. Loneliness was associated with increased risk of incident multimorbidity [aHR (95 % CI): 1.38 (1.15–1.65)], whereas social isolation was not [aHR (95 % CI): 0.97 (0.81–1.16)]. Multimorbidity was associated with increased risk of incident loneliness [aHR (95 % CI): 1.55 (1.30–1.84)], but not significantly associated with subsequent risk of incident social isolation [aHR (95 % CI): 1.09 (0.92–1.28)]. Conclusions: An independent bidirectional association exists between loneliness and multimorbidity. Interventions targeting loneliness may prevent or delay multimorbidity and also improve wellbeing for people with multimorbidity.
Corrigendum to ‘Remote Vital Sign Monitoring in Admission Avoidance Hospital at Home: A Systematic Review’ [Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 25 (2024) 105080] (Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (2024) 25(8), (S1525861024005024), (10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105080))
The authors regret the wrong artwork for Figure 5 was published in the above-mentioned article. The online version of the article has now been updated with the correct Figure 5 and the correct figure has also been reproduced below. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Supporting the drive for net zero by decarbonising general practice – A longitudinal study protocol
Introduction The urgency to address climate change and reduce carbon emissions in healthcare, highlighted in the United Kingdom (UK) by the 'Delivering a 'Net Zero' National Health Service (NHS)' report, emphasises the need for healthcare organisations to adopt and integrate sustainability practices. General practice is recognised as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, but evidence on achieving effective decarbonisation in general practice is limited, a knowledge gap that urgently needs further research. This study aims to examine the current approaches general practice uses for decarbonisation and to provide practical recommendations for facilitating, advancing, and sustaining these efforts, contributing to the goal of a net zero NHS. Methods and analysis This 30-month longitudinal case study spans three geographical sites in England and uses a mixed methods study design. It adopts a comprehensive approach, merging sociological (Normalisation Process Theory - NPT) and behavioural theories (Theoretical Domains Framework - TDF) to understand and address factors influencing decarbonisation efforts in general practice. NPT focuses on collective behaviours, emphasising relationships and interactions among professionals, patients, and stakeholders. TDF, with 14 domains simplifying behavioural change theories, concentrates on individual, social, and environmental factors. A systematic review will be conducted, and quantitative and qualitative data will be collected over a 12-month period from general practice, staff, patients, public, and key stakeholders’ perspectives through surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Additionally, a non-clinical carbon calculator, alongside prescribing data, will be gathered to assess measurable changes in carbon emissions, informing a budget impact model for practice-specific and generic use. Dissemination A dynamic dissemination and impact strategy is aimed at ensuring broad awareness, adoption, and accelerated uptake of decarbonisation measures. Outputs, including lay summaries, factsheets, policy briefs and academic presentations will be produced throughout the study and undergo regular review, targeting key audiences and ensuring alignment with regional and national goals.
Implementation of decarbonisation actions in general practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol
IntroductionThere is growing recognition of the importance of primary care in addressing climate change. The World Organisation of Family Doctors has urged general practitioners worldwide to commit to tackling climate change and to serve as agents of systemic and individual change. Though an increasing number of resources have become available to support the decarbonisation of primary care, there remains a lack of evidence about how primary care teams are using them, their reach across practices, their level of adoption and maintenance, their cost impact and their effect on carbon emissions. This systematic review aims to understand how primary care, with a focus on general practice or equivalent settings within the context of primary care, is implementing decarbonisation actions to reduce carbon emissions arising from its operations, assess efficacy of the actions and generate recommendations on how to assist and accelerate their implementation and effectiveness.Methods and analysisThe literature search will be conducted on Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and ProQuest, from 2007 to 29 March 2024. Article screening will be based on specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Narrative synthesis will be used to analyse and integrate findings to offer new insights into key mechanisms that support decarbonisation in general practice and help refine an initial programme theory. The reporting of the systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis framework.Ethics and disseminationThis review did not involve the collection or analysis of any data that was not included in previously published research in the public domain. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023470889.
Patient experiences of remote consulting with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis and fibromyalgia: a qualitative study
BackgroundRemote and digital consulting in primary care has rapidly expanded since March 2020. It is important to understand patient experiences, particularly for those living with complex long-term conditions, to identify how care can best be delivered, including within the remote space.AimTo explore the experiences of people living with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis [CFS/ME] and Fibromyalgia when consulting remotely in primary care.Design & settingSemi-structured interviews with patients living with CFS/ME and fibromyalgia in general practice in EnglandMethodSemi-structured interviews were carried out with 13 participants. The interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically according to a Foucauldian theoretical framework.ResultsAll participants highlighted needing to feel believed by clinicians. Many reported difficulties with telephone and online consulting due to the lack of physical communication. Positive outcomes were reported when there was a good relationship with a clinician. Continuity in care and recognising the complexity of these conditions were also considered important.ConclusionThis study allowed people living with CFS/ME and Fibromyalgia to describe their experiences when consulting remotely. Participants highlighted needing to feel listened to and felt they benefited from an ongoing relationship with a clinician although this was difficult to achieve when consulting remotely. Some advantages of remoted consulting were reported, particularly when symptoms were troublesome. Flexible access systems with a range of consultation modalities or preferred clinician(s) availability could improve healthcare encounters, particularly given the increased use of remote consulting, in primary care.
GP’s role in supporting women with anal incontinence after childbirth injury: a qualitative study
Background Obstetric anal sphincter injury is the most common cause of anal incontinence for women, which often has profound impacts on women’s lives. GPs offer a first line of contact for many women, but we know that very few women experiencing anal incontinence postnatally report discussing it with their GPs. Aim To identify key ways in which GPs can support women with anal incontinence caused by childbirth injuries. Design and setting A qualitative study investigating women’s experiences with their GP, and GPs’ perspectives about providing such care. Method This qualitative study combined two phases: first, a series of in-depth semi-structured interviews with women experiencing anal incontinence caused by childbirth injuries (n = 41); and second, focus groups with GPs (n = 13) stratified by experience. Thematic analysis was conducted and relevant themes from across the two datasets were examined. Results Mediating factors in GP care for women with anal incontinence caused by childbirth injuries centred around three key themes: the role of the GP, access and pathways, and communication. Conclusion The findings demonstrate multifactorial challenges in identifying the problem and supporting women experiencing anal incontinence after childbirth injury in primary care settings. Many GPs lacked confidence in their role in supporting women, and women were often reluctant to seek help. Those women who did seek help often experienced frustrations consulting with their GPs. In a context where women are often reluctant to ask for help, their concerns are not always taken seriously, and where GPs do not routinely ask about anal incontinence, potential anal incontinence after childbirth injury appears to be often missed in a primary care setting.
Investigating Patient Use and Experience of Online Appointment Booking in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.
BACKGROUND: Online appointment booking is a commonly used tool in several industries. There is limited evidence about the benefits and challenges of using online appointment booking in health care settings. Potential benefits include convenience and the ability to track appointments, although some groups of patients may find it harder to engage with online appointment booking. We sought to understand how patients in England used and experienced online appointment booking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe and compare the characteristics of patients in relation to their use of online appointment booking in general practice and investigate patients' views regarding online appointment booking arrangements. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study set in English general practice comprising a retrospective analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) and semistructured interviews with patients. Data used in the retrospective analysis comprised responses to the 2018 and 2019 GPPS analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Semistructured interviews with purposively sampled patients from 11 general practices in England explored experiences of and views on online appointment booking. Framework analysis was used to allow for comparison with the findings of the retrospective analysis. RESULTS: The retrospective analysis included 1,327,693 GPPS responders (2018-2019 combined). We conducted 43 interviews with patients with a variety of experiences and awareness of online appointment booking; of these 43 patients, 6 (14%) were from ethnic minority groups. In the retrospective analysis, more patients were aware that online appointment booking was available (581,224/1,288,341, 45.11%) than had experience using it (203,184/1,301,694, 15.61%). There were deprivation gradients for awareness and use and a substantial decline in both awareness and use in patients aged >75 years. For interview participants, age and life stage were factors influencing experiences and perceptions, working patients valued convenience, and older patients preferred to use the telephone. Patients with long-term conditions were more aware of (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% CI 1.41-1.44) and more likely to use (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.63-1.67) online appointment booking. Interview participants with long-term conditions described online appointment booking as useful for routine nonurgent appointments. Patients in deprived areas were clustered in practices with low awareness and use of online appointment booking among GPPS respondents (OR for use 0.65, 95% CI 0.64-0.67). Other key findings included the influence of the availability of appointments online and differences in the registration process for accessing online booking. CONCLUSIONS: Whether and how patients engage with online appointment booking is influenced by the practice with which they are registered, whether they live with long-term conditions, and their deprivation status. These factors should be considered in designing and implementing online appointment booking and have implications for patient engagement with the wider range of online services offered in general practice.
The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on hospices: A systematic integrated review and synthesis of recommendations for policy and practice
Background: The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in the development of numerous recommendations for practice and policy for specialist palliative care provided by hospices in United Kingdom (UK), as hospices were significantly affected by the pandemic and protections put in place. The aim of this review is to identify and synthesise recommendations or implications for policy and practice that have been generated for adult hospice specialist palliative care during the first 24 months of the Covid-19 pandemic. Methods: AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, HMIC, Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed databases were searched for peer-reviewed papers, as well as hand searches for grey literature. Literature relating to hospices and Covid-19 in the UK were included and a thematic synthesis of recommendations for hospice policy and practice was undertaken. Results: 858 articles were identified with 12 meeting the inclusion criteria. Fifty-eight recommendations or implications were identified: 31 for policy, 27 for practice, and 10 covering both. Recommendations were organised under ten themes. There were several recommendations seeking to secure hospice resources to mitigate the short-term impact of the pandemic, as well as those focused on longer-term implications such as core funding. The impact of the pandemic on the quality of hospice care was the focus for numerous recommendations around improving integration of hospice care in the community, provision of bereavement support and better use of Advance Care Plans (ACP). However, there were significant gaps related to carer visitation in hospices, inequities of palliative care, or hospice-at-home services. Conclusion: The Covid-19 pandemic and protections exposed several ongoing policy and practice needs, especially around hospice resources, while generating novel issues for hospices to address. Significant policy gaps remain to be addressed to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on the quality of hospice specialist palliative care.
The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on hospices: A systematic integrated review and synthesis of recommendations for policy and practice.
BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in the development of numerous recommendations for practice and policy for specialist palliative care provided by hospices in United Kingdom (UK), as hospices were significantly affected by the pandemic and protections put in place.The aim of this review is to identify and synthesise recommendations or implications for policy and practice that have been generated for adult hospice specialist palliative care during the first 24 months of the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, HMIC, Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed databases were searched for peer-reviewed papers, as well as hand searchers for grey literature. Literature relating to hospices and Covid-19 in the UK were included and a thematic synthesis of recommendations for hospice policy and practice was undertaken. RESULTS: 858 articles were identified with 12 meeting the inclusion criteria. Fifty-eight recommendations or implications were identified: 31 for policy, 27 for practice, and 10 covering both. Recommendations were organised under ten themes. There were several recommendations seeking to secure hospice resources to mitigate the short-term impact of the pandemic, as well as those focused on longer-term implications such as core funding. The impact of the pandemic on the quality of hospice care was the focus for numerous recommendations around improving integration of hospice care in the community, provision of bereavement support and better use of Advance Care Plans (ACP). However, there were significant gaps related to carer visitation in hospices, inequities of palliative care, or hospice-at-home services. CONCLUSION: The Covid-19 pandemic and protections exposed several ongoing policy and practice needs, especially around hospice resources, while generating novel issues for hospices to address. Significant policy gaps remain to be addressed to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on the quality of hospice specialist palliative care.
What do we know about the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on hospices? A collaborative multi-stakeholder knowledge synthesis.
BACKGROUND: Prior to undertaking a study looking at the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic upon lived experiences of hospice services in the West Midlands, we sought to identify the range of issues that hospice service users and providers faced between March 2020 and July 2021, and to provide a report that can be accessed and understood by all interested stakeholders. METHODS: We undertook a collaborative multi-stakeholder approach for scoping the range of potential issues and synthesising knowledge. This involved a review of available literature; a focus group with hospice stakeholders; and a collaborative knowledge exchange panel. RESULTS: The literature on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospices remains limited, but it is developing a picture of a service that has had to rapidly adapt the way it provides care and support to its service users, during a period when it faced many fundamental challenges to established ways of providing these services. RESULTS: The impacts of many of the changes on hospices have not been fully assessed. It is also not known what the effects upon the quality of care and support are for those with life-limiting conditions and those that care for them. We found that the pandemic has presented a new normative and service context in which quality of care and life itself was valued that is, as yet, poorly understood.