Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This review of the literature on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) focuses on its long-term effects on educational and economic outcomes, the impact of pharmacological treatments, and broader societal costs. It offers a critical perspective, complementing existing health science reviews by: (a) including studies from the economics literature that employ quasi-experimental methods; (b) critically comparing the estimation strategies adopted in past studies; and (c) emphasizing unresolved econometric challenges. The review key findings are summarized as follows: (a) The quasi-experimental evidence based on sibling fixed effect estimation and genetic variation confirms that ADHD negatively impacts educational and economic outcomes. Notably, separating the effects of inattention and hyperactivity reveals that inattention drives adverse educational outcomes, while hyperactivity does not. (b) When evaluating the effect of medications on long-term outcomes, the lack of long-term random control trial studies requires addressing the challenge of non-random selection into ADHD treatment. A novel, promising estimation approach to address this selection issue is using pharmacoepidemiological studies that exploit administrative data and quasi-random variation in prescription rates across health providers. While this is possibly the most convincing estimation approach, it captures the causal effect of medications only for marginally treated patients who tend to be individuals with milder ADHD symptoms. The findings from these studies could be generalized to the full population only if there are no heterogeneous effects of the treatment and, in particular, if the effect of medications is identical across patients with different levels of symptoms. Adopting the marginal treatment effect framework is a potential methodological solution for future research. (c) Evidence indicates that children with milder ADHD symptoms are more likely to have a marginal diagnosis if they are the youngest in their school grade and if they live in countries or areas with higher rates of ADHD diagnoses. As a result, a cautious interpretation is required when comparing the estimated effects of pharmacological treatment across different countries or children with different propensity to be diagnosed. (d) The total economic burden of ADHD is substantial and multifaceted, extending beyond healthcare to include education costs, lost productivity, and justice system expenses, with significant spillover effects on families, peers, and society. Capturing all these costs is econometrically challenging and data-demanding, and there is a need for more robust empirical evidence and more findings for developing countries. Focusing on developed countries, recent studies estimate the annual per-person cost of ADHD at $244 to $18,751 (2019 constant dollars).

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.964

Type

Chapter

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Publication Date

2025-04-16T00:00:00+00:00