Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: The GPEvidence website is a new point of care information resource aimed at general practitioners, providing quantitative information on the benefits and harms of treatments for common long-term conditions, an identified gap in clinicians' knowledge. AIM: To explore whether the clinical content in GPEvidence can be accessed and understood by GPs in a way which can be integrated into their clinical thinking and decision making. DESIGN & SETTING: Online questionnaire and focus group with British General Practitioners METHOD: Online focus groups. Within these, participants were first invited to consider hypothetical treatment decisions based on fictional clinical vignettes, then give individual responses about their anticipated consultation and treatment intentions in an online survey. This was followed by an online semi-structured focus group discussion. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, and quantitative data presented as summary statistics. RESULTS: In the main, the clinical content of GPEvidence was easily understood by GPs. Changes in intended prescribing and discussions with patient were described, as well as increases in confidence. Some barriers to use were identified mainly relating to competing system pressures. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the usability of GPEvidence and suggests it has potential to introduce new information and influence practice. This could support shared decision-making and person-centred practice. It is a preliminary study with limitations, and further research is needed to assess its impact in real-world settings.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0109

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2025-11-03T00:00:00+00:00

Keywords

clinical decision-making, evidence-based practice, primary health care