Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Background: Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorders with profound impacts on cognitive function. There is a shortage of economic evidence relating to the impact that Alzheimer’s disease has on healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Methods: We estimated conventional multivariable models of the association between Alzheimer’s disease and these core economic outcomes. However, these types of model may be confounded by omitted variables. We therefore also explored a causal approach using germline genetic variation as instrumental variables in a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis including polygenic risk scores in a two-stage least squares model, inverse variance weighted models, and pleiotropy robust models. We studied outcomes in the UK Biobank cohort. Results: Data from up to 310,838 individuals were analyzed. N = 55 cases of Alzheimer’s disease were reported at or before recruitment into UK Biobank. A further N = 284 incident cases were identified over follow-up. Analysis of the prevalent cases suggested significant impacts on costs (£1,140 in cases, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): £825 to £1,456) and QALYs (-25%, 95% CI: -28% to -21%). Mendelian randomization estimates were imprecise for costs (£3,082, 95% CI: -£7,183 to £13,348) and QALYs (-32%, 95% CI: -149% to 85%), likely due to the small proportion of variance (0.9%) explained in Alzheimer’s disease status by the most predictive set of SNPs. Implications: Conventional multivariable models suggested important impacts of Alzheimer’s disease on inpatient hospital costs and QALYs, although this finding was based on very few cases. Mendelian randomization was very imprecise. Larger GWAS of clinical cases, improved understanding of the architecture of the disease, and the follow-up of cohorts until old age and death will help overcome these challenges.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1186/s12962-025-00684-y

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

24