Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: To make research on sensitive topics accessible to participants with intellectual disabilities, researchers have used innovative, non-standard data collection methods. However, there is a lack of information about data analysis, validity and reliability. METHODS: Using the example of a focus group study on end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities, the development and implementation of several creative data collection methods and the process of data analysis are described and discussed. RESULTS: Newly developed data collection tools were presented as 'games' that successfully elicited participant perspectives. Data analysis involved the Framework method within an interpretivist phenomenological research paradigm. It incorporated extensive team discussions, including researchers and advisors with intellectual disabilities. CONCLUSION: Any activity can become a valid data collection tool if it fits the study's research paradigm, has a clear rationale, is co-developed and tested with people with intellectual disabilities and if the analytical process is clearly described.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1111/jar.70232

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-05-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

39

Keywords

data analysis, death and dying, inclusive research, intellectual disability, interpretivist phenomenology, qualitative research, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Data Collection, Research Design, Focus Groups, Data Analysis, Qualitative Research