Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Objective: To compare a shortened hospital stay with midwife visits at home to usual hospital care after delivery. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Maternity unit of a Swiss teaching hospital. Population: Four hundred and fifty-nine women with a single uncomplicated pregnancy at low risk of caesarean section. Methods: Women were randomised to either home-based (n = 228) or hospital-based postnatal care (n = 231). Home-based postnatal care consisted of early discharge from hospital (24 to 48 hours after delivery) and home visits by a midwife; women in the hospital-based care group were hospitalised for four to five days. Main outcome measures: Breastfeeding 28 days postpartum, women's views of their care and readmission to hospital. Results: Women in the home-based care group had shorter hospital stays (65 vs 106 hours, P < 0.001) and more midwife visits (4.8 vs 1.7, P < 0.001) than women in the hospital-based care group. Prevalence of breastfeeding at 28 days was similar between the groups (90% vs 87%, P = 0.30), but women in the home-based care group reported fewer problems with breastfeeding and greater satisfaction with the help received. There were no differences in satisfaction with care, women's hospital readmissions, postnatal depression scores and health status scores. A higher percentage of neonates in the home-based care group were readmitted to hospital during the first six months (12% vs 4.8%, P = 0.004). Conclusions: In low risk pregnancies, early discharge from hospital and midwife visits at home after delivery is an acceptable alternative to a longer duration of care in hospital. Mothers' preferences and economic considerations should be taken into account when choosing a policy of postnatal care.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00227.x

Type

Journal article

Journal

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Publication Date

01/08/2004

Volume

111

Pages

807 - 813