Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Background. Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in the UK, yet only 50% of CHD patients receive appropriate secondary prevention. Objectives. To explore GP attitudes to evidence about CHD, and to identify factors influencing the implementation of secondary prevention in GP consultations. Methods. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups exploring consultations with patients previously diagnosed as having CHD. Results. Use of evidence is influenced by credibility. Lack of time was the greatest barrier to accessing evidence and to implementing secondary prevention. Patients were more likely to receive secondary prevention in a dedicated clinic. Patient characteristics including physical and mental co-morbidity mitigate against secondary prevention. GPs experienced difficulty balancing implementation of evidence with the demands of the doctor-patient relationship. Conclusions. The doctor-patient relationship may act as a barrier to the delivery of secondary prevention in primary care. It may be time to re-evaluate models of these relationships and reconsider the strategies for implementing evidence.


Journal article


Family Practice

Publication Date





605 - 610