COVID-19 Surveillance in a Primary Care Sentinel Network: In-Pandemic Development of an Application Ontology (Preprint)
de Lusignan S., Liyanage H., McGagh D., Jani BD., Bauwens J., Byford R., Evans D., Fahey T., Greenhalgh T., Jones N., Mair FS., Okusi C., Parimalanathan V., Pell JP., Sherlock J., Tamburis O., Tripathy M., Ferreira F., Williams J., Hobbs FDR.
<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>Creating an ontology for COVID-19 surveillance should help ensure transparency and consistency. Ontologies formalize conceptualizations at either the domain or application level. Application ontologies cross domains and are specified through testable use cases. Our use case was an extension of the role of the Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) to monitor the current pandemic and become an in-pandemic research platform.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> <p>This study aimed to develop an application ontology for COVID-19 that can be deployed across the various use-case domains of the RCGP RSC research and surveillance activities.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> <p>We described our domain-specific use case. The actor was the RCGP RSC sentinel network, the system was the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the outcomes were the spread and effect of mitigation measures. We used our established 3-step method to develop the ontology, separating ontological concept development from code mapping and data extract validation. We developed a coding system–independent COVID-19 case identification algorithm. As there were no gold-standard pandemic surveillance ontologies, we conducted a rapid Delphi consensus exercise through the International Medical Informatics Association Primary Health Care Informatics working group and extended networks.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> <p>Our use-case domains included primary care, public health, virology, clinical research, and clinical informatics. Our ontology supported (1) case identification, microbiological sampling, and health outcomes at an individual practice and at the national level; (2) feedback through a dashboard; (3) a national observatory; (4) regular updates for Public Health England; and (5) transformation of a sentinel network into a trial platform. We have identified a total of 19,115 people with a definite COVID-19 status, 5226 probable cases, and 74,293 people with possible COVID-19, within the RCGP RSC network (N=5,370,225).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> <p>The underpinning structure of our ontological approach has coped with multiple clinical coding challenges. At a time when there is uncertainty about international comparisons, clarity about the basis on which case definitions and outcomes are made from routine data is essential.</p> </sec>