Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Background: To support shared decision making and improve the management of polypharmacy, it is recommended that GPs take into account quantitative information on the benefits and harms of treatments. Quantitative evidence shows GPs’ knowledge of this is low. Aim: To explore GPs’ attitudes to and understanding of the quantitative benefits and harms of treatments for long term conditions. Design and Setting: Qualitative interview study in UK General Practice. Method: Semi-structured interviews with 15 GPs. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and a framework approach used for analysis. Results: Participants described knowing or using quantitative information on benefits and harms for only a few treatments. There was awareness of this knowledge deficit coupled with low confidence in statistical terminology. Some perceived an absence of this information as an important barrier to optimal care, others were content to follow guidelines. In the absence of this knowledge, other strategies were described to individualise treatment decisions. The idea of increasing the use of quantitative information on the benefits and harms of treatment appealed to most, with imagined benefits for patients and themselves. However, potential barriers were described: a need for accessible information that can be understood and integrated into real-world practice, system factors and communication challenges. Conclusion: GPs are aware of their knowledge deficit with regard to an understanding of quantitative benefits and harms of treatments. Most were positive about the idea of increasing their use of this in practice but described important challenges which need to be considered when designing solutions.

Original publication

DOI

10.3399/bjgp.2020.1027

Type

Journal article

Journal

British Journal of General Practice

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Publication Date

04/05/2021

Pages

BJGP.2020.1027 - BJGP.2020.1027