Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

When a published statistical model is also distributed as computer software, it will usually be desirable to present the outputs as interval, as well as point, estimates. The present paper compares three methods for approximate interval estimation about a model output, for use when the model form does not permit an exact interval estimate. The methods considered are first-order asymptotics, using second derivatives of the log-likelihood to estimate variance information; higher-order asymptotics based on the signed-root transformation; and the non-parametric bootstrap. The signed-root method is Bayesian, and uses an approximation for posterior moments that has not previously been tested in a real-world application. Use of the three methods is illustrated with reference to a software project arising in medical decision-making, the UKPDS Risk Engine. Intervals from the first-order and signed-root methods are near-identical, and typically 1% wider to 7% narrower than those from the non-parametric bootstrap. The asymptotic methods are markedly faster than the bootstrap method.

Original publication





Publication Date





967 - 981