Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a method for comparing the appropriateness of hysterectomy use in different health plans. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Seven managed care organizations. PATIENTS: Random sample of all nonemergency, non-oncological hysterectomies performed in the seven managed care organizations over a 1-year period. Patients who were not continuously enrolled in a plan for 2 years prior to their hysterectomy were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of women undergoing hysterectomy in each plan for inappropriate clinical reasons according to ratings derived from a panel of managed care physicians. RESULTS: Overall, about 16% of women underwent hysterectomy for reasons judged to be clinically inappropriate. Only one plan had significantly more hysterectomies rated inappropriate compared with the group mean (27%, unadjusted). Adjusting for age and race did not affect the rankings of the plans and had little effect on the numeric results. CONCLUSION: The rates of inappropriate use of hysterectomies are similar to those for other procedures and vary to a small degree among health plans. This information may be useful to purchasers when they consider which health plans to offer their employees.

Original publication

DOI

10.1001/jama.269.18.2398

Type

Journal article

Journal

JAMA

Publication Date

12/05/1993

Volume

269

Pages

2398 - 2402

Keywords

Adult, Aged, Female, Health Maintenance Organizations, Health Services Misuse, Health Services Research, Humans, Hysterectomy, Middle Aged, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Retrospective Studies, United States, Utilization Review