Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Background: A bowel cancer screening programme is being introduced in the UK. The programme will screen men and women aged 60-69 using faecal occult blood testing (FOBt). Uptake rates in the pilot evaluation were <60%. This study aimed to determine whether the acceptability of FOBt is associated with the sampling method or previous exposure to FOBt. Methods: Postal questionnaire assessing the perceived acceptability of three potential methods of FOBt sampling: (1) sterile transport swab; (2) smear card [as used in the national screening roll-out]; (3) faecal specimen pot [routinely used in the NHS for stool samples]. Study population comprised those aged 50-69. Results: Response rate was 63%. FOBt was reported as acceptable by 94.5%. Acceptability fell significantly when sampling methods were detailed. The swab was rated more acceptable than the card or the pot (90.2% versus 62.9% versus 63.0%, p < 0.0005). FOBt acceptability did not vary with previous experience of FOBt. Conclusions: The acceptability of FOBt varied by the sampling method described. The smear card, such as that used in the national screening programme, was the least preferred method. To increase the uptake of screening, alternative methods of faecal sampling should be considered. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original publication




Journal article


European Journal of Cancer

Publication Date





1437 - 1444