Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In the UK, up to 700 people with HIV give birth annually; the majority are Black African migrant cisgender women. Infant-feeding decisions for parents with HIV are complex, requiring parents to weigh-up the small risk of HIV transmission via breastmilk and UK guidelines recommending formula milk, against strong personal and societal expectations to breastfeed. We explored this situation in a qualitative study. In this paper, we discuss our experiences of co-producing our research on infant-feeding experiences and practices among women with HIV. In particular, we focus on how our methodology, working practices and team structure enabled us to hear and describe the ‘silences’ and ‘screaming silences’ faced by our socially marginalised study participants. For the participants, intense multidimensional anxieties regarding infant-feeding had to be managed within a wider context and with people who were largely unaware of the potentially devastating impact that decision had on their reality. Our interdisciplinary study team and advisory panel comprised women with HIV, clinicians, policymakers and academics; the majority were racially minoritised women. Through regular team meetings, respect for the varied perspectives of all contributors and diverse dissemination routes, we sustained relational ethics with a broad range of stakeholders and impacted national policy.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/1467-9566.13871

Type

Journal article

Journal

Sociology of Health and Illness

Publication Date

01/01/2025

Volume

47