Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence from clinical trials suggests that antihypertensive treatment is associated with an increased risk of common electrolyte abnormalities. We aimed to develop and validate two clinical prediction models to estimate the risk of hyperkalaemia and hyponatraemia, respectively, to facilitate targeted treatment and monitoring strategies for individuals indicated for antihypertensive therapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants aged at least 40 years, registered to an English primary care practice within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), with a systolic blood pressure reading between 130 and 179 mmHg were included the study. The primary outcomes were first hyperkalaemia or hyponatraemia event recorded in primary or secondary care. Model development used a Fine-Gray approach with death from other causes as competing event. Model performance was assessed using C-statistic, D-statistic, and Observed/Expected (O/E) ratio upon external validation. RESULTS: The development cohort included 1 773 224 patients (mean age 59 years, median follow-up 6 years). The hyperkalaemia model contained 23 predictors and the hyponatraemia model contained 29 predictors, with all antihypertensive medications associated with the outcomes. Upon external validation in a cohort of 3 805 366 patients, both models calibrated well (O/E ratio: hyperkalaemia 1.16, 95% CI 1.13-1.19; hyponatraemia 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02) and showed good discrimination at 10 years (C-statistic: 0.69, 95% CI 0.69-0.69; 0.80, 95% CI 0.80-0.80, respectively). CONCLUSION: Current clinical guidelines recommend monitoring serum electrolytes after initiating antihypertensive treatment. These clinical prediction models predicted individuals' risk of electrolyte abnormalities associated with antihypertensive treatment and could be used to target closer monitoring for individuals at a higher risk, where resources are limited.

Original publication

DOI

10.1097/HJH.0000000000004032

Type

Journal article

Journal

J Hypertens

Publication Date

22/04/2025

Keywords

ACE inhibitors, Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, CI, CPRD, CVD, Cardiovascular Disease, Confidence Interval, EHRs, Electronic Frailty Index, Electronic health records, Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate, GP, General Practice, HES, Hospital Episode Statistics, IMD, IQR, ISAC, Independent Scientific Advisory Committee, Index of Multiple Deprivation, Interquartile Range, NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, O/E, ONS, Observed/Expected, RAAS, SD, SHR, STRATIFY, Standard Deviation, Sub-distribution hazard ratios, TRIPOD, The Clinical Practice Research Datalink, The Office for National Statistics, The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, The STRAtifying Treatments In the multimorbid Frail elderlY, Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis, antihypertensive therapy, clinical decision-making, drug-related adverse effects, eFI, eGFR, serum electrolytes monitoring