Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Objectives: To identify the range of patient pathways following surgery for colorectal cancer and explore patients' needs and preferences for follow-up. Methods: A survey of hospitals within the UK Colorectal Cancer Services Collaborative and qualitative thematic analysis of 39 in-depth narrative interviews with colorectal cancer patients. Participants volunteered or were contacted through hospital consultants, support groups and general practitioners (GPs). Most of the interviews were collected in respondents' homes, throughout the UK. Results: Thirty-five (70%) hospitals supplied details of their follow-up regime. There was a wide variation: only three hospitals specifically stated that patients were given a choice about the type of follow-up. The patients' interviews highlighted their need for a responsive GP and realistic information about recovery, resources and diet. Choice is particularly important because patients differ in their views of the benefits of hospital follow-up. Conclusions: The absence of evidence about what constitutes ideal clinical follow-up for colorectal cancer is reflected in current hospital practice. In such circumstances, the preferences of individual patients are particularly important. Not all patients want repeated specialist investigations but those without stomas, and therefore no access to a stoma nurse, need another source of advice about recovery and long-term practical help. Follow-up care organised by GPs may be acceptable to many patients. We suggest a list of topics for GPs to discuss with their patients about follow-up. The needs described by patients are not extensive and could often be met by existing resources. © The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd 2004.

Original publication




Journal article


Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

Publication Date





159 - 164