Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Seventy-three patients with RA were assessed by means of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS) and a number of clinical measures. Patients with RA scored higher than controls on the NHP scales for energy, pain, mobility and sleep. Energy, pain, mobility and emotions scales of the NHP correlate significantly with other measures such as clinical assessments, matching scales of the AIMS and the Beck Depression Inventory, indicating satisfactory validity for the instrument with RA. Five of the six scales of the NHP are stable on retesting. The social scale of the NHP on the other hand does not correlate with the matching instrument of the AIMS and is relatively unstable over time. Measurement properties of generic health status instruments such as the NHP will require serious attention as they are increasingly used in evaluation studies. © 1992 Oxford University Press.

Original publication




Journal article



Publication Date





87 - 90