Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

All trials require a compromise between including sufficient practitioners to recruit a representative cohort of patients and the time and cost of recruiting and maintaining the motivation of these practitioners. Prior beliefs relating to the efficacy and direct or side effects of an intervention affect both doctor and patient participation. Trials in any setting are rarely fully representative with respect to both patient and disease related characteristics. Modelling, sensitivity, analysis, and statistical estimates of uncertainty are necessary to determine the generalisability of trials and to particularise results to a given clinical setting. Trials in primary care should give more representative results and are preferable to applying results obtained in secondary care.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmj.321.7252.24

Type

Journal article

Journal

British Medical Journal

Publication Date

01/07/2000

Volume

321

Pages

24 - 27