Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Background: As obesity levels increase, opportunistic behaviour change counselling fromprimary care clinicians in consultations about healthy eating is evermore important. However, little is known about the approaches clinicians take with patients. Aim: To describe the content of simulated consultations on healthy eating in primary care, and compare this with the content of smoking cessation consultations. Design and setting: Qualitative study of 23 audiotaped simulated healthy eating and smoking cessation consultations between an actor and primary care clinicians (GPs and nurses) within a randomised controlled trial looking at behaviour change counselling. Method: Consultations were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, then analysed inductively using thematic analysis. A thematic framework was developed by all authors and applied to the data. The content of healthy eating consultations was contrasted with that given for smoking cessation. Results: There was a lack of consistency and clarity when clinicians discussed healthy eating compared with smoking; in smoking cessation consultations, the content was clearer to both the clinician and patient. There was a lack of specificity about what dietary changes should bemade, how changes could be achieved, and how progress could bemonitored. Barriers to change were addressed inmore depth within the smoking cessation consultations than within the healthy eating encounters. Conclusion: At present, dietary counselling by clinicians in primary care does not typically contain consistent, clear suggestions for specific change, how these could be achieved, and how progress would bemonitored. Thismay contribute to limited uptake and efficacy of dietary counselling in primary care. ©British Journal of General Practice.

Original publication

DOI

10.3399/bjgp12X616328

Type

Journal article

Journal

British Journal of General Practice

Publication Date

01/01/2012

Volume

62