Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Purpose: To validate a modified ETDRS visual acuity (VA) chart developed for European-wide use, in populations that use the Cyrillic, Latin or Greek alphabet. Methods: The charts were validated in three groups: 310 school children in Bulgaria (mean age 13 ± 1 years), 227 school children in Greece (mean age 14 ± 1 years) and 85 patients with no ocular pathology in Belgium (mean age 26 ± 5 years). VA was assessed with the habitual refractive correction, using the standard ETDRS charts and the modified European-wide charts. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the test-retest reliability of the European-wide chart. The Bland-Altman comparison method was used to assess agreement between the two different versions of the new chart, as well as to compare these to the standard ETDRS-charts. Limits of agreement were calculated for differences in VA scores (test-retest variability (TRV)) between measurement sessions for the European-wide charts. Results: The TRV of the European-wide charts was found to be ±0.10 logMAR, corresponding to 5 ETDRS letters, for both chart 1 and chart 2. The ICC was estimated to be 0.968 for the RE and 0.961 for the LE. The European-wide charts generated on average slightly higher logMAR scores compared to the standard ETDRS charts in all three groups. Conclusions: The "European-wide" charts appear to be a valid alternative to the standard ETDRS acuity charts, offering the advantage of containing letters readable by all European citizens. © 2012 Spanish General Council of Optometry.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.optom.2012.06.008

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of Optometry

Publication Date

01/01/2013

Volume

6

Pages

18 - 24