Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

© 2017 BMJ. We need to advance our understanding of the interaction between dietary fat and human health. But the Minnesota Coronary Experiment has multiple methodological shortcomings, such as discrepant reporting, heavy attrition, and lack of wider relevance. Our detailed re-analysis empirically shows that any claims to change our current understanding of the relationship between saturated fat intake and mortality are not fully supported by data from the experiment.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmj.j2108

Type

Journal article

Journal

BMJ (Online)

Publication Date

01/01/2017

Volume

357