Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The survival of 85 anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA)-positive (mean Mayo risk score, 5.11) and 19 AMA-negative (mean Mayo risk score, 4.77) primary biliary cirrhosis patients, under ursodeoxycholic acid not subjected to liver transplantation, was compared with the estimated survival of a simulated control group of untreated patients created with the updated Mayo model and a control group from the general population. In the first 7 years 3 AMA-negative patients died, versus 12 under the Mayo model (P=0.01), and 10 AMA-positive patients, versus 26 under the Mayo model (P<0.005), with 7 expected deaths from the general population (P<0.0001). At 10 years the cumulative survival differed in the treated patients overall (P<0.0001) but not in the early primary biliary cirrhosis (stages I-II) patients compared to the general population. Therefore the survival of our patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid is higher than that predicted from the Mayo model. Early treatment may prolong survival.

Original publication

DOI

10.1023/B:DDAS.0000037811.48575.da

Type

Journal article

Journal

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Publication Date

01/08/2004

Volume

49

Pages

1190 - 1195