Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To identify outcomes relevant to women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: A national study conducted in the United Kingdom. SAMPLE: Purposive sample of women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia. METHODS: Thematic analysis of qualitative interview transcripts. RESULTS:Thirty women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia were interviewed. Thematic analysis identified 71 different treatment outcomes. Fifty-nine of these had been previously reported by pre-eclampsia trials. Outcomes related to maternal and neonatal morbidity, commonly reported by pre-eclampsia trials, were frequently discussed by women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia. Twelve outcomes had not been previously reported by pre-eclampsia trials. When compared with published research, it was evident that the outlook of women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia was broader. They considered pre-eclampsia in relation to the 'whole' person and attached special significance to outcomes relating to emotional well being and the future health, development, and wellbeing of their offspring. CONCLUSIONS: Selecting, collecting, and reporting outcomes relevant to women with pre-eclampsia should ensure future pre-eclampsia research has the necessary reach and relevance to inform clinical practice. Future core outcome set development studies should use qualitative research methods to ensure the long list of potential core outcomes holds relevance to patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. KEYWORDS: Outcomes; and qualitative research; core outcome sets; in-depth patient interviews; pre-eclampsia. PMID: 30653799 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15616

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/1471-0528.15616

Type

Other

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

17/01/2019