Search results (170)
« Back to PublicationsCompliance with existing standards: overview comparing Cochrane with non-Cochrane living systematic reviews.
Golob MM. et al, (2026), Syst Rev
Interventions to Enable or Improve Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health and Preventive Medicine: A Scoping Review
Groot E. et al, (2026), Ajpm Focus, 5
Subcutaneous Levodopa in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Burton M. et al, (2026), European Journal of Neurology, 33
Evaluation of the replicability of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of the effects of health interventions
Hamilton DG. et al, (2026), Research Synthesis Methods
Educating health professionals in evidence-based practice in 2026
Innocenti T. et al, (2026), BMJ Evidence Based Medicine
Entering a liminal state when becoming a social prescribing link worker and how it affects retention: findings from a UK qualitative study
Tierney S. et al, (2025), Primary Health Care Research and Development, 26
Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey
Tierney S. et al, (2025), Bjgp Open, 9
Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project
Wilkinson J. et al, (2025), Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 184
The influence of intervention fidelity on treatment effect estimates in clinical trials of complex interventions: a metaepidemiological study
Páez A. et al, (2025), Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 177
Where do UK clinicians find information at the point of care? A pragmatic, exploratory study
McCartney M. et al, (2024), BMC Primary Care, 25
High certainty evidence is stable and trustworthy, whereas evidence of moderate or lower certainty may be equally prone to being unstable
Djulbegovic B. et al, (2024), Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 171