Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Search results (157)

« Back to Publications

Retraction notice to “Effects of environmental impact and nutrition labelling on food purchasing: An experimental online supermarket study” [Appetite 180 (2023) 106312] (Appetite (2023) 180, (S0195666322004032), (10.1016/j.appet.2022.106312))

Potter C. et al, (2025), Appetite, 205

Supermarket interventions to improve dietary and lifestyle behaviours: what is the key to success?

Piernas C., (2024), BMC Medicine, 22

Do promotions of healthier or more sustainable foods increase sales? Findings from three natural experiments in UK supermarkets

Luick M. et al, (2024), BMC Public Health, 24

ssociations between dietary patterns and incident colorectal cancer in 114,443 individuals from the UK Biobank: a prospective cohort study.

Samuel S. et al, (2024), Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention

ssociations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024), Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 33, 1445 - 1455

Supplementary Table S3 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Supplementary Table S5 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Supplementary Table S2 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Supplementary Table S8 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Supplementary Table S7 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Table 2 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Supplementary Table S9 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Table 1 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Supplementary Table S4 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Supplementary Table S6 from Associations between Dietary Patterns and Incident Colorectal Cancer in 114,443 Individuals from the UK Biobank: A Prospective Cohort Study

Skulsky SL. et al, (2024)

Load More

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
»