Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Publications

Self-monitoring blood pressure in Pregnancy: Evaluation of health professional experiences of the BUMP trials

Chisholm A. et al, (2024), Pregnancy Hypertension, 35, 88 - 95

Street Voice: Can Citizens' Juries help tackle urban sustainability challenges?

Chisholm A. et al, (2023), Science Talks, 8, 100254 - 100254

Self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: A mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic

Wilson H. et al, (2022), Pregnancy Hypertension, 30, 7 - 12

Effect of Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Control in Pregnant Individuals with Chronic or Gestational Hypertension: The BUMP 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Chappell LC. et al, (2022), JAMA, 327, 1666 - 1678

Effect of Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure on Diagnosis of Hypertension during Higher-Risk Pregnancy: The BUMP 1 Randomized Clinical Trial

Tucker KL. et al, (2022), JAMA, 327, 1656 - 1665

‘Team ethnography visual maps’: Methods for identifying the ethnographic object in multiple sites of fieldwork

Parkin S. et al, (2021), Ethnography, 146613812110383 - 146613812110383

“You Probably Won’t Notice Any Symptoms”: Blood Pressure in Pregnancy—Discourses of Contested Expertise in an Era of Self-Care and Responsibilization

Hinton L. et al, (2021), Qualitative Health Research, 31, 1632 - 1644

Gender in the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist

Albury C. et al, (2021), International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 33

How do frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement? Findings from an ethnographic case study evaluation

Locock L. et al, (2020), Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 25, 151 - 161

Wild data: how front-line hospital staff make sense of patients’ experiences

Montgomery CM. et al, (2020), Sociology of Health and Illness, 42, 1424 - 1440

'Team capital' in quality improvement teams: Findings from an ethnographic study of front-line quality improvement in the NHS

Montgomery C. et al, (2020), BMJ Open Quality, 9

Blood pressure monitoring in high-risk pregnancy to improve the detection and monitoring of hypertension (the BUMP 1 and 2 trials): Protocol for two linked randomised controlled trials

Dougall G. et al, (2020), BMJ Open, 10

Understanding how front-line staff use patient experience data for service improvement: an exploratory case study evaluation

Locock L. et al, (2020)

What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach

Coxon K. et al, (2017), BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17

008 OP: THE ENACTMENT OF COLLABORATION THROUGH MEETINGS: INSIGHTS FROM THE US-PEX a PROJECT b

Montgomery CM. et al, (2017), BMJ Open, 7

Household decision-making for everyday travel: a case study of walking and cycling in Lancaster (UK)

Pooley CG. et al, (2011), JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 19, 1601 - 1607