Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Publications

Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project

Wilkinson J. et al, (2025), Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 184

The influence of intervention fidelity on treatment effect estimates in clinical trials of complex interventions: a metaepidemiological study

Páez A. et al, (2025), Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 177

Too Much Dental Radiography - Reply

Nadanovsky P. et al, (2024), JAMA Internal Medicine, 184

Where do UK clinicians find information at the point of care? A pragmatic, exploratory study

McCartney M. et al, (2024), BMC Primary Care, 25

The CONSIDER Intervention Fidelity Framework for Complex Interventions in Healthcare: A “Best-Fit” Framework Synthesis

Paez A. et al, (2024)

The development, inter-rater agreement, and reliability of The CONSIDER Intervention Fidelity Checklist for clinical trials of complex interventions in healthcare.

Paez A. et al, (2024)

High certainty evidence is stable and trustworthy, whereas evidence of moderate or lower certainty may be equally prone to being unstable

Djulbegovic B. et al, (2024), Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 171

Too Much Dentistry

Nadanovsky P. et al, (2024), JAMA Internal Medicine, 184, 713 - 714

Clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for SARS-CoV-2 published in leading medical journals report adherence but not how it was assessed

Lee C. et al, (2024), British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 90, 1130 - 1141

Defining success in adult obesity management: A systematic review and framework synthesis of clinical practice guidelines

Juul-Hindsgaul N. et al, (2024), Clinical Obesity, 14

Ethics of posthumous scholarly authorship in the sciences

Nunan D. and Aronson JK., (2024), BMJ

The CONSIDER Intervention Fidelity Framework for Complex Interventions in Healthcare: A “Best-Fit” Framework Synthesis

Páez A. et al, (2024)

What is the probability that higher versus lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates?

Djulbegovic B. et al, (2024), Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Ten resources for understanding bias in health research: EBM live workshop 2022

Nunan D. et al, (2023), BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 28, 337 - 340

Catalogue of bias: racial bias

Naicker R. and Nunan D., (2023), BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 29, 114 - 116

Very high risk of bias

Pires dos Santos AP. et al, (2023), British Dental Journal, 234

Insights into the quantification and reporting of model-related uncertainty across different disciplines

Simmonds EG. et al, (2022), iScience, 25

'Delicate diagnosis': avoiding harms in difficult, disputed, and desired diagnoses

McCartney M. et al, (2022), British Journal of General Practice, 72, 580 - 581

Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals.

Gardener AD. et al, (2022), JRSM Open, 13

Appraising qualitative health research—towards a differentiated approach

Williams V. et al, (2022), BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 27, 212 - 214

Load More

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
»