Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Publications

Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol

LaPlante A. et al, (2021), Systematic Reviews, 10

Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study

Cook JA. et al, (2021), Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 7

GPs' use and understanding of the benefits and harms of treatments for long-term conditions: A qualitative interview study

Treadwell J. et al, (2021), British Journal of General Practice, 71, E660 - E667

Patch augmentation surgery for rotator cuff repair: the PARCS mixed-methods feasibility study.

Cook JA. et al, (2021), Health Technol Assess, 25, 1 - 138

Recruitment and retention of participants in UK surgical trials: a survey of key issues reported by trial staff

CROCKER J. et al, (2020), BJS Open

What happens after James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships? A qualitative study of contexts, processes and impacts

Staley K. et al, (2020), Research Involvement and Engagement, 6

Patch Augmented Rotator Cuff Surgery (PARCS) Feasibility Study

COOK J. et al, (2020), Health Technology Assessment

Documentation of breakthrough pain in narrative clinical records of children with life-limiting conditions: Feasibility of a retrospective review

Oostendorp LJM. et al, (2019), Journal of Child Health Care, 23, 564 - 578

PIRRIST: Patient and public involvement (PPI) to enhance recruitment and retention in surgical trials

Crocker JC. et al, (2019), TRIALS, 20

Using Stakeholder Focus Groups in a Qualitative Study of the Acceptability, Feasibility and Design of a Randomised Trial PARCS Feasibility Study

Cooper C. et al, (2019), TRIALS, 20

Patient and public involvement (PPI) in UK surgical trials: A survey and focus groups with stakeholders to identify practices, views, and experiences

Crocker JC. et al, (2019), Trials, 20

Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study-protocol for a feasibility study

Cook JA. et al, (2018), Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4

Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Crocker JC. et al, (2018), BMJ (Online), 363

Priorities for methodological research on patient and public involvement in clinical trials: A modified Delphi process

Kearney A. et al, (2017), Health Expectations, 20, 1401 - 1410

Priorities for methodological research on patient and public involvement in clinical trials: A modified Delphi process

Kearney A. et al, (2017), HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 20, 1401 - 1410

Keeping all options open: Parents’ approaches to advance care planning

Beecham E. et al, (2017), Health Expectations, 20, 675 - 684

Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study

Crocker JC. et al, (2017), Health Expectations, 20, 519 - 528

How might patient and public involvement (PPI) improve recruitment and retention in surgical trials? A qualitative study exploring the views of trial staff and PPI contributors

Crocker J. et al, (2017), TRIALS, 18

Does hearing the patient perspective improve consultation skills in examinations? An exploratory randomized controlled trial in medical undergraduate education

Snow R. et al, (2016), Medical Teacher, 38, 1229 - 1235

Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study

Crocker JC. et al, (2016), Health Expect, n/a - n/a

Load More