Overarching Priorities for Health and Care Research in the United Kingdom: A Coproduced Synthesis of James Lind Alliance ‘Top 10s’
Crocker JC. et al, (2024), Health Expectations, 27
Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol
LaPlante A. et al, (2021), Systematic Reviews, 10
Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study
Cook JA. et al, (2021), Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 7
GPs' use and understanding of the benefits and harms of treatments for long-term conditions: A qualitative interview study
Treadwell J. et al, (2021), British Journal of General Practice, 71, E660 - E667
Patch augmentation surgery for rotator cuff repair: the PARCS mixed-methods feasibility study.
Cook JA. et al, (2021), Health Technol Assess, 25, 1 - 138
Findings from the Patch Augmented Rotator Cuff Surgery (PARCS) Feasibility Study
Cook JA. et al, (2021)
Recruitment and retention of participants in UK surgical trials: a survey of key issues reported by trial staff
CROCKER J. et al, (2020), BJS Open
What happens after James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships? A qualitative study of contexts, processes and impacts
Staley K. et al, (2020), Research Involvement and Engagement, 6
Patch Augmented Rotator Cuff Surgery (PARCS) Feasibility Study
COOK J. et al, (2020), Health Technology Assessment
Documentation of breakthrough pain in narrative clinical records of children with life-limiting conditions: Feasibility of a retrospective review
Oostendorp LJM. et al, (2019), Journal of Child Health Care, 23, 564 - 578
PIRRIST: Patient and public involvement (PPI) to enhance recruitment and retention in surgical trials
Crocker JC. et al, (2019), TRIALS, 20
Patch-augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) study-protocol for a feasibility study
Cook JA. et al, (2018), Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Crocker JC. et al, (2018), BMJ (Online), 363
Priorities for methodological research on patient and public involvement in clinical trials: A modified Delphi process
Kearney A. et al, (2017), Health Expectations, 20, 1401 - 1410
Priorities for methodological research on patient and public involvement in clinical trials: A modified Delphi process
Kearney A. et al, (2017), HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 20, 1401 - 1410
Keeping all options open: Parents’ approaches to advance care planning
Beecham E. et al, (2017), Health Expectations, 20, 675 - 684
Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study
Crocker JC. et al, (2017), Health Expectations, 20, 519 - 528