Targeted atrial fibrillation (AF) detection in COVID-19 vaccination clinics
Hicks N. and Ford G., (2021), European Heart Journal
Outcome-based commissioning: has its time come?
Ballard T. et al, (2016), Br J Gen Pract, 66, e219 - e221
WHY OUTCOMES MATTER. We must keep our eyes on the outcomes prize.
Bell D. and Hicks N., (2016), Health Serv J, 126, 16 - 17
How true outcomes-based commissioning can really 'liberate' healthcare services.
Bell D. et al, (2015), Future Hosp J, 2, 147 - 149
Guideline-based early rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Mayou RA. et al, (2002), Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52, 89 - 95
Hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: A method for comparative access and quality studies using routinely collected statistics
Brown AD. et al, (2001), Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92, 155 - 159
Depression and anxiety as predictors of outcome after myocardial infarction
Mayou RA. et al, (2000), Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 212 - 219
Users' guides to the medical literature: XVII. How to use guidelines and recommendations about screening. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.
Barratt A. et al, (1999), JAMA, 281, 2029 - 2034
Evidence based case report: chlamydia infection in general practice.
Hicks NR. et al, (1999), BMJ, 318, 790 - 792
Uptake of research findings into clinical practice: A controlled study of the impact of a brief external intervention on the use of corticosteroids in preterm delivery [1]
Mant J. et al, (1999), Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5, 73 - 79
6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK.
Boyd PA. et al, (1998), Lancet, 352, 1577 - 1581
Coronary event and case fatality rates in an English population: Results of the Oxford myocardial infarction incidence study
Volmink JA. et al, (1998), Heart, 80, 40 - 44
Assessing quality of care: what are the implications of the potential lack of sensitivity of outcome measures to differences in quality?
Mant J. and Hicks NR., (1996), J Eval Clin Pract, 2, 243 - 248
Correcting outcome data for case mix in stroke medicine. Study should have had more patients or longer time scale.
Mant J. et al, (1996), BMJ, 313
Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines.
Hadorn DC. et al, (1996), J Clin Epidemiol, 49, 749 - 754