Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Publications

Appraising qualitative health research-towards a differentiated approach

Williams V. et al, (2022), BMJ evidence-based medicine, 27, 212 - 214

Physical activity for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

Nunan D. et al, (2022), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022

Incidence of Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Death in Young Athletes and Military Members: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lear A. et al, (2022), Journal of Athletic Training, 57, 431 - 443

Screening Electrocardiogram in Young Athletes and Military Members: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lear A. et al, (2022), Journal of Athletic Training, 57, 444 - 451

Advocating for evidence-informed decisions to make healthcare fit for each person

Franco JVA. et al, (2022), BMJ evidence-based medicine, 27, 65 - 66

Open science policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeat cross-sectional study

Gardener A. et al, (2022)

High quality (certainty) evidence changes less often than low-quality evidence, but the magnitude of effect size does not systematically differ between studies with low versus high-quality evidence

Djulbegovic B. et al, (2022), Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Correction to: Much ado about something: a response to “COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?” (Trials, (2021), 22, 1, (780), 10.1186/s13063-021-05755-y)

Haber NA. et al, (2021), Trials, 22

Much ado about something: a response to “COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?”

Haber NA. et al, (2021), Trials, 22

The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence

Page MJ. et al, (2021), Systematic Reviews, 10

Online supplementation for teaching evidence-based medicine: Feasibility of a randomised-controlled trial

McCall MC. et al, (2021), BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 26

Education in evidence-based health care: never a greater need.

Nunan D., (2021), BMJ Evid Based Med

Analysis exemplary medical care or Trojan horse?

Nunan D. et al, (2021), British Journal of General Practice, 71, 229 - 232

Adherence in leading medical journals to the CONSORT 2010 statement for reporting of binary outcomes in randomised controlled trials: cross-sectional analysis.

Nunan D. et al, (2021), BMJ Evid Based Med

Adherence to conflicts of interest policy in Cochrane reviews where authors are also editorial board members: A cross-sectional analysis

Pacheco RL. et al, (2021), Research Synthesis Methods

Outcome Reporting bias in Exercise Oncology trials (OREO): a cross-sectional study

Singh B. et al, (2021)

What items should be included in an early warning score for remote assessment of suspected COVID-19? qualitative and Delphi study

Greenhalgh T. et al, (2020), BMJ Open, 10

Ten papers for teachers of evidence-based medicine and health care: Sicily workshop 2019.

Nunan D. et al, (2020), BMJ Evid Based Med

Diabetes and COVID-19: Risks, Management, and Learnings From Other National Disasters

Hartmann-Boyce J. et al, (2020), Diabetes care, 43, 1695 - 1703

Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review

Muthee TB. et al, (2020), Implementation science : IS, 15

Load More

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
»